Occupy Yourself, Barriers to Free Market Entry (and Who Benefits)

“Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner” – James Bovard

The “Occupy Wall Street” movement (and Occupy Other Places) continues on today. To be honest, I don’t know what these guys want. I’ve read articles and looked for some sort of guidebook or manifesto, but the details are sketchy at best. It seems they’re upset (a point on which we agree). It seems they want less corporate greed and corruption (good luck with that), and less corporate control over the system (amen, brothers).

Since I can’t find anything explicit about the movement (maybe it’s out there, I just haven’t found it), I thought I’d chat for a bit about free market participation, barriers to entry, and who benefits.

My Employment History … Well, Some of It

When I was in college I worked for a friend who had a car-washing business. We didn’t have our own facilities, we just picked up cars from nearby businesses, drove them over to the spray & wash at the local gas station, cleaned them (by hand, not just spray & wash), and took them back. Eventually my friend left town and I continued on working for another person who took over.

I remember having debates with the new boss about the nature of the business and the room for profit margin. You see, I was making $9 an hour, and was bringing in about twice that much in profits ($20 a car minus the few coins to run the wash & vacuum – and it took a bit under an hour to do a car, but I rounded for simplicity). To my mind, this was a HUGE profit margin for the boss. We take the pre-wage profits that I generate (using his customers) and split it 50-50.

If I ever felt like I didn’t like the deal, I could easily start my own car-washing business. The capital needs for startup amount to maybe $30 for buckets, sponges, rags, armorall, windex, etc. After that it’s just clientele and sweat, both of which I could come by rather easily. There was really no reason I couldn’t have just started my own business and made nearly double my wages – other than I didn’t really want to and would soon leave anyway to take a teaching position and then on to graduate school.

A few years earlier I worked for a porta-toilet company back in my hometown of Conover, NC. I know what you’re thinking (OK, I don’t know exactly what you’re thinking – but I’m sure whatever you are thinking is colorful). It was actually a good job (and I was in good with the boss). The contrasts between the two were dramatic though, simply from a barrier-to-entry standpoint.

To run a porta-toilet company, you’d first need a truck, which could cost quite a bit of money. We’ll say we get a good deal on a serviceable $50,000 truck. Then you need toilets, which can run upwards of $400 a piece. Let’s suppose you need at least 125 of those (probably more like 200, but let’s keep it small). Now we’re up to $100,000. Add on other equipment (pressure washers, pickup truck for deliveries, etc.) and a facility to store your non-deployed toilets – you can easily be looking at $150,000 just to start a one-man toilet company. And that’s just to scrape by. Best case you’re probably only looking at $8000 or so a month in revenue (supposing all toilets deployed at $70/month), minus fuel, dumping fees, loan payments … you’d be lucky to see $1000 a month at the end.

My point? This is a huge barrier-to-entry. People don’t just up and start a toilet company when they have an idea on how to do it better – but they could up and start a car-washing company any time they choose.

Why Barriers Matter – the Balance of Capital

So why do these barriers matter? It has been said (and I believe it) that the free market is the most ruthless force we have for eliminating profit. As soon as somebody is making a buck at something, somebody else comes along with a better idea, or a willingness to take less profit, and undercuts them. The profits get wiped out quickly and people have to work harder and continually find better ways to get the job done.

Barriers to entry slow the feedback process that destroys the profits. They add inertia to the process, or perhaps just viscosity.

More than that, they shift the balance of power in the market. Consider that it takes both resources (e.g., money) and capability (e.g., the know-how to wash a car or pump a toilet) to make the business productive. When the resource requirements (the barriers-to-entry) are small, the balance of power is shifted toward the skill, ingenuity, productivity, and drive of the worker. He owns the market and can command a wage that is utterly and intrinsically consistent with his productivity.

However, when barriers are high, when large resource quantities are needed to enter the market, the balance of power is shifted toward the holders of resources – the necessary capital to buy a seat at the table. In case you missed it, that’s the wealthy.

Ultimately, the barriers-to-entry hurt the consumer in the form of higher prices.

Consider another example (not really focused on the wealthy, we’ll get back to them in just a moment). I have a number of friends who have started photography businesses. In the old days it took a good deal of capital to run your own photography business. You needed expensive cameras, expensive lighting, expensive film, and your own dark room. You were selling not only your expertise as a photographer, but also your equipment and facilities.

Then, all of a sudden, the digital camera boom hit (technology is great, isn’t it?). Now the cameras are cheaper (and probably better). It’s all digital, so you don’t need a dark room. The film is just flash memory (awesome). Start-up costs have dropped by at least an order of magnitude.

This is great for aspiring photographers. It’s easier to get into the business. Further, you don’t have to do it full time to justify the purchases. Yes, profit margins will necessarily shrink because you’re now only trading your skill as a photographer and not as much your ownership of great equipment. Still, you get to break into a business that you like and perhaps make some money too.

It’s great for consumers too. Not just in the form of better prices – but also in the form of an expanded talent pool. There really are people out there who are great at photography, but don’t have the time, risk aversion, or start-up capital needed to make a full-time business out of it. Now they can get into the market and offer their talents to the consumers.

The “Pain” of Regulation …

I say all of this as a set up for a brief discussion of regulatory overbearance. Candidates in various presidential primary debates and commercials have made a big deal about there being too much government regulation. The free market “proponents” claim this slows down the engine of the economy. Defenders of regulation say that they are necessary to protect the consumers.

I’ll let them have that fight, my interest lies more with who actually benefits from these barriers.

Suppose the government passes a regulation that makes my business 10% less productive. Is that bad for me? Well, if I don’t tell you anything else, then you’d assume the answer is “yes, that is bad”. But now suppose that the same regulation actually makes my nearest competitor’s business 30% less productive. Now is it bad? I think not. I now have a significant price cushion over my competitor (that equals profit margin). Further, the regulation likely pushes us further out on the supply-demand intersection, and may well push him out of business before me – leaving me as the owner of a larger share of the market.

The regulations set up to protect the consumers (and the employees) actually have the impact of preventing the motion of the free market.

Employees who tire of their treatment at work and wish to start their own, similar business, find that they need not only the necessary equipment and facilities, but a gaggle of compliance officers, accountants, and lawyers just to stay square with the law. This gives the entrenched, established business owners, the large corporations, and the wealthy greater leverage in the employment debate. They know that their ace talented employee can’t just leave to start his own shop, so they can extract a higher percentage of his productivity into their pockets.

My point?

The very system that the grass-roots-left thinks can be used to reign in corporate greed (regulations meant to “punish” business and force them to “play nice”) actually plays right into the hands of the mega-corporations. They know how the system works. They know that regulations may require them to hire another lawyer or two, but will force their small business competitor out of the market.

In a freer market, the people (isn’t that who the left defends?) get to keep a greater portion of their productivity. They have much greater leverage at the bargaining table. They can work in their own capacities doing what they are best at, or doing what they find most rewarding while also feeding their families. They are free – and they are empowered.

Isn’t that what we all want? Well, all of us except the mega-corporate powers and perhaps the “Occupy Wall Street” crowd … if we can ever figure out what they stand for.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Occupy Yourself, Barriers to Free Market Entry (and Who Benefits)

  1. Bluesky says:

    Declaration of the Occupation of New York City

    As we gather together in solidarity to express a feeling of mass injustice, we must not lose sight of what brought us together. We write so that all people who feel wronged by the corporate forces of the world can know that we are your allies.

    As one people, united, we acknowledge the reality: that the future of the human race requires the cooperation of its members; that our system must protect our rights, and upon corruption of that system, it is up to the individuals to protect their own rights, and those of their neighbors; that a democratic government derives its just power from the people, but corporations do not seek consent to extract wealth from the people and the Earth; and that no true democracy is attainable when the process is determined by economic power. We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments. We have peaceably assembled here, as is our right, to let these facts be known.

    They have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process, despite not having the original mortgage.

    They have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity, and continue to give Executives exorbitant bonuses.

    They have perpetuated inequality and discrimination in the workplace based on age, the color of one’s skin, sex, gender identity and sexual orientation.

    They have poisoned the food supply through negligence, and undermined the farming system through monopolization.

    They have profited off of the torture, confinement, and cruel treatment of countless nonhuman animals, and actively hide these practices.

    They have continuously sought to strip employees of the right to negotiate for better pay and safer working conditions.

    They have held students hostage with tens of thousands of dollars of debt on education, which is itself a human right.

    They have consistently outsourced labor and used that outsourcing as leverage to cut workers’ healthcare and pay.

    They have influenced the courts to achieve the same rights as people, with none of the culpability or responsibility.

    They have spent millions of dollars on legal teams that look for ways to get them out of contracts in regards to health insurance.

    They have sold our privacy as a commodity.

    They have used the military and police force to prevent freedom of the press.

    They have deliberately declined to recall faulty products endangering lives in pursuit of profit.

    They determine economic policy, despite the catastrophic failures their policies have produced and continue to produce.

    They have donated large sums of money to politicians supposed to be regulating them.

    They continue to block alternate forms of energy to keep us dependent on oil.

    They continue to block generic forms of medicine that could save people’s lives in order to protect investments that have already turned a substantive profit.

    They have purposely covered up oil spills, accidents, faulty bookkeeping, and inactive ingredients in pursuit of profit.

    They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through their control of the media.

    They have accepted private contracts to murder prisoners even when presented with serious doubts about their guilt.

    They have perpetuated colonialism at home and abroad.

    They have participated in the torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas.

    They continue to create weapons of mass destruction in order to receive government contracts.*

    To the people of the world,

    We, the New York City General Assembly occupying Wall Street in Liberty Square, urge you to assert your power.

    Exercise your right to peaceably assemble; occupy public space; create a process to address the problems we face, and generate solutions accessible to everyone.

    To all communities that take action and form groups in the spirit of direct democracy, we offer support, documentation, and all of the resources at our disposal.

    Join us and make your voices heard!

    *These grievances are not all-inclusive.

  2. Pingback: Sovereign Elite Rent Seekers | Freedom at Bethsaida

  3. Pingback: If You Can’t Work Well, You Can’t Work At All | Freedom at Bethsaida

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s